wow, I hadn't read MidnightJams Reply on the matter either. I'm glad that Ansel's Work and techniques have stuck with so many.
DJ
This is a discussion on Over Manipulatd Crap within the Casual Chat forums, part of the OTHER FORUMS category; wow, I hadn't read MidnightJams Reply on the matter either. I'm glad that Ansel's Work and techniques have stuck with so many. DJ...
wow, I hadn't read MidnightJams Reply on the matter either. I'm glad that Ansel's Work and techniques have stuck with so many.
DJ
No purist is going to call me a chicken !
. . . there were also purists who would argue fowl . . .
John B
What she said.Well said, MidniteJam and DJ.
The camera is an eye with limited capacity.
It is the vision (and skill) of the photographer that makes the image.
I get too emotional and can never deliver an argument that clear.
I used to think this way but I watched a training video on Photoshop for Photographers and the things Chris Orwig did where just incredible. And not all of those things were that difficult. I could finally see the potential in learning more. (I was using CS2 at a minimal level, mostly using the transform tools to warp images so I could stitch them together)
If they don't want to learn digital darkroom it's less competition. At the bare minimum, they have to be a sight better than I am. They have to have perfect exposure, I just need to be close.
I currently spend a fair amount of time on Google Plus: https://plus.google.com/103236949470535942612
my personal website (not very current I'm afraid): clupica and family
my photogarphy : cwlupica - Photograher
my photos on SmugMug. StudioLupica on SmugMug
me on facebook: Charles Lupica
My fan page on facebook: StudioLupica